Is the concept of transnational identity a threat to Iranian national Essay

Is the concept of transnational identity a threat to Iranian national identity and the development of International Cooperation - Essay Example This project examines the relationship between global culture and how Iran constructs the global identity on a transworld reference in the modern society. More schools of thought have put more emphasis on the Iranian multi-identity including religious, national and modern ones. It has been said that Iranian identity is divided above social and cultural events and challenges. The Iranian identity has been constructed by the global culture, mass media and global economy, but there are diversities between development and disorientation of Iranian identity over time. Various events have transformed Iran over time; right from the Safavieh dynasty and the Islamic republic of Iran are two separate historical accounts with divergent variations. Appadurai, A. (1996). Table of Contents Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Table of Contents 3 Globalization 3 Definition of Identity 4 The Literature on Iranian Identity 7 The Iranians and Diaspora 9 Children of the Revolution 11 Transnational Identity 13 The Network of Iranian Professionals of Orange County 14 Imagining Culture, Imagining Home 16 After September 11 17 Conclusion 19 References: 21 Globalization Contemporary thought of thinking has been spreading on a global scale from the late 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. The period after the WWII has been so crucial in the whole of humanity, since it's this period that has been viewed as the genesis to the application of the philosophy of modernization which ideally constructed economic, political, cultural, social and geographical consolidation around the globe. This has been made possible with the advent of computers and the internet infrastructures making the 21st century a century of globalization, supraterritoriality or transworld...According to research it has been construed that persons get to know each other through identities. Persons and groups depict themselves in such a way as to retain a positive sel-evaluation in comparison with other groups. Morgan, P. M. (1999). Structural functionalists believe that a change in underlying social or psychological conditions leads to change in identity. Identity, transforms pr ogressively whilst society develops from conventional to industrial and modern arrangements. Through this process national identity changes to a more general and diverted one. The transformations are exhibited across the entire societies where changes communal identity is prevalent. Taykeyh, R. (2006). In regard to symbolic interactionists identity connotes a reflection of what someone is, through others; this is basically a dynamic identity factor of a person’s comprehension of oneself and others. Identity is a product of agreement and disagreement. Without a framework of personal or collective identity, people will be similar and the idea of uniqueness won’t crop up. The above distinct notions pay a close attention to the relationship flanked by individuals and collective identity. Scholars such as Mead (1934) and Goffman (1956) established about the self and its role in different social conditions. From this perspective identity evolved and changes through the time and in space; in a renewal cycle.